Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Robert Anderson -- 1917-2009

"Years from now, when you talk of this -- and you will -- be kind." - Tea and Sympathy by Robert Anderson.
Robert Anderson, a playwright whose intimate emotional dramas like “Tea and Sympathy” and “I Never Sang for My Father” attracted big names to the Broadway stage if not always substantial audiences to Broadway theaters, died Monday at home in Manhattan. He was 91.

The cause was complications of Alzheimer’s disease, said Nevin Terence Busch, Mr. Anderson’s stepson.

Mr. Anderson was a contemporary of Arthur Miller and Tennessee Williams, and though his reputation never ascended to the artistic heights that theirs did — his plays often walked a tightrope between realism and sentimentality — he was among the theater’s most visible, serious playwrights of the 1950s and ’60s.

Mr. Anderson also wrote screenplays, including those for “The Sand Pebbles” (1966), with Steve McQueen, and “The Nun’s Story” (1959), with Audrey Hepburn. But he thought of himself as a playwright who wrote movies for money.
I was standing on the terrace of a house called Glencliff in Independence, Kansas. It was the first evening of my first William Inge Theatre Festival in April 1991. I was at a dinner for invited guests, and I was there because I was friends of the Inge family. I walked up to the little bar set up on the patio and asked the bartender, a dapper man in a blue blazer and tie, for a drink. He promptly poured it out for me, smiled, and handed it over. A moment later, the real bartender, a college kid in the appropriate white coat, came back carrying a bag of ice, and thanked the other man, who turned to me and said, "Hi, I'm Bob." It was Robert Anderson, and as it slowly dawned on me that I had been served my first drink at the Inge Festival by one of its first honorees, I stammered my apology for assuming that he was the bartender. He laughed, patted me on the shoulder, and said, "I'd probably make a better living doing that."

I had read all of his plays -- Tea and Sympathy; I Never Sang for My Father; You Know I Can't Hear You When the Water's Running; Silent Night, Lonely Night -- and as we chatted I felt like I was talking to kindred spirit. I knew exactly how Tom Lee felt in Tea and Sympathy, being an "off horse" at a boarding school (although I didn't have the outcome he did during my miserable year), and as I spoke to him about his occasionally tempestuous relationship with his father, I saw how he turned that into a story -- I Never Sang for My Father-- that anyone, even someone who is very close to his father, could understand in the most intimate way.

Bob and I became friends at that first Inge Festival, and we kept in touch by mail during the months between each festival. He came back every year -- something very few of the honorees do after their time in the spotlight -- and he participated in all the panel discussions. He took an active interest in my work as well, and when he asked for a copy of one of my plays, I was beyond flattered. A month later I received a five-page letter telling me how much he enjoyed the play, complimented my characters, my dialogue, my use of space, the depth of the relationships between the characters, and then with gentle guidance he told me what he thought didn't work. He urged me to explore the characters with even more depth -- "I know you can" -- and asked me to keep working on it and let him see what developed. I had never had such a detailed critique of my work, not even in grad school, and he inspired me to keep writing.

Bob became a devoted friend. His letters, always either typed on his old manual typewriter or written in his nearly indecipherable handwriting, were full of stories about his life in Connecticut and his tennis games at the court he shared with his neighbor, Arthur Miller. And when he said, "If you're ever in New York, let me know," he meant it. In February 1993 I went to New York for a teacher's conference, and when I wrote him and suggested we meet up for lunch, he called me immediately and set the date. True to form, at the appointed hour, he was waiting for me in the lobby of the New York Hilton, nattily dressed in a suit and tie. He had walked from his apartment up on Sutton Place. After lunch I offered to get him a cab for the trip back, but he smiled and said, "No, I love to walk." And so we did, up to Central Park, talking about all sorts of things.

Bob never won the Pulitzer Prize or a Tony for his work, and in some ways I think it rankled him that other playwrights that he knew -- and sometimes competed with for production space -- did. But his attitude about it seemed to be philosophical, and his quip, "You can't make a living in theatre, but you can make a killing," pretty much summarized his feeling about those who became famous beyond their worth. Above all, he was always a gentleman and a gentle man.

The last time I saw him was at the Inge Festival in 2001. It was apparent that he was beginning to fade into the long night of Alzheimer's; he remembered me, but did not remember reading a book I'd written and that he had written detailed notes on several years before. I said goodbye to him in the lobby of the hotel that Sunday morning in April 2001 with the sense that we were parting for good. I heard from friends who saw him over the years that he was slipping away, and I was sorry that I would not be able to sit with him in the shade of the trees at the 4-H picnic grounds in Independence and just talk one more time.

I'll keep a place for you at the table in April, Bob.

PS: Can't Live Without You is dedicated to Bob.

Labels:

Monday, December 17, 2007

Dramatic News

I can now cross one more thing off my Life Goals list.

The Manhattan Repertory Theatre of New York has selected my play, Can't Live Without You, for its Winterfest 2008 series. It will open on Wednesday, January 23 with additional performances on Friday, January 25 and Saturday, January 26. Tickets are $20 (with a complimentary beverage) and are available through their website or by calling 646-329-6588.

What this means is that I will be a New York-produced playwright.

A lot of the credit goes to Rachel Charlop-Powers who read the play at the William Inge Theatre Festival last April and fell in love with it. She's been the driving force behind this production, and I will be eternally grateful to her.

Oh, yes, I'm going to see it, and if you're in the New York area, please come and see it.

As a little background, this play merges two characters from my works -- Donny Hollenbeck of Small Town Boys and Bobby Cramer of Bobby Cramer -- into one story. I started working on Can't Live Without You in the winter of 2001 when I was having a writer's block on Bobby Cramer and hadn't yet resumed work on Small Town Boys. So the Donny who is in the play isn't the "same" Donny in novel; he's a writer living with his girlfriend in the Florida Keys. But in a lot of ways, they are similar; they're both going through life almost oblivious to things around them until something startles them to the point of waking up and seeing their life from the third person.

Can't Live Without You is a romantic comedy in two acts and I had a lot of fun writing it. I've been trying to get theatres and producers to read it and even workshop it since I wrote it, but this opportunity at the Manhattan Rep came out of Rachel's efforts and I am very happy -- and fortunate -- to have a friend like her with such enthusiasm and love for the story.

Anyway, if you're in the NYC area, I hope you'll come see it, and I hope that you like it.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

Ask Me Anything

I attended a master playwriting class taught by Tina Howe (Coastal Disturbances, The Art of Dining) at the William Inge Theatre Festival last month. A couple of days before the class she gave us an assignment: "write a 10 page scene in which two or three characters go through an activity that changes them forever." I had originally planned to submit a scene I'd written several years ago, but after thinking about it, I decided to go with something new. So the day before the class during a break between sessions, I sat down at the computer in my room at the Apple Tree Inn and batted out this little piece in about an hour. Ms. Howe's last admonition on the assignment was "Have a ball!" -- and I did.

Ask Me Anything

Scene: An office. A desk with a chair and two other chairs. A small stack of folders is on the desk.

At rise, STEVE is standing next to the desk. MARTIN enters. He is carrying a folder.

MARTIN: I’m here for the interview.

STEVE: Right. Take a seat. (MARTIN sits in one of the chairs. STEVE indicates the folder.) Is that your application?

MARTIN: Oh, yes. Sorry.

(Hands it to him. STEVE opens the folder, leafs through some of the papers, then sits behind the desk, still reading the papers. MARTIN watches him intently.)

STEVE (reading papers): Hmm. (Turns a page.) Hmm.

MARTIN: Something wrong?

STEVE (still reading): Hmm.

MARTIN: What is it? Did I leave out something?

STEVE (closing folder): You do realize that the position you’ve applied for is extremely sensitive. We’ll need to do a thorough background check on you.

MARTIN: I signed the waiver. But...

STEVE (interrupting): Yes, I see you signed the waiver. Very good. But there’s more to this than just signing the waiver saying that you will allow us to investigate everything about you going back to, oh, high school and beyond. This is, after all, a very sensitive position in the company.

MARTIN: Really? I didn’t know that. I thought...

STEVE (interrupting): You thought you were applying for the data entry position in the accounts receivable department.

MARTIN: Yes.

STEVE: That position has been filled.

MARTIN: Oh.

STEVE: But you caught our eye in another area.

MARTIN: Oh, really? What?

STEVE: Well, as I said, it’s a highly sensitive position. You’d be responsible for some very confidential information and the processing thereof. So I’m going to have to ask you some questions that will determine whether or not you’re the right person for the job.

MARTIN (hesitant): Okay.

STEVE: You sound hesitant.

MARTIN: No. It’s just that...

STEVE (interrupting): You thought you were applying for another job.

MARTIN: Yeah.

STEVE: You did sign the waiver, though. It would be a pity to let that go to waste. And you did go to all the trouble to come down here – get dressed up nicely – for this interview. And you’re probably just what we’re looking for in this highly sensitive job.

MARTIN: Okay.

STEVE: So I’m going to ask you these questions.

MARTIN: Okay.

STEVE: Good. Ready?

MARTIN: Yes, sir.

STEVE: Have you ever had sex in a public place?

MARTIN (stunned): What?

STEVE: I’m sorry, I’ll speak up. Have you ever had sex in a public place?

MARTIN: Uh....

STEVE: Perhaps I should have asked if you’ve ever had sex and then gone from there.

MARTIN: Why....?

STEVE: We have to know these things. You did sign the waiver.

MARTIN: How, uh, how...uh, what do you mean by “public?”

STEVE: In a park. A parking garage. A public toilet. A glory hole. A tea room.

MARTIN: I don’t even know what some of those places are.

STEVE: Certainly you know what a park is.

MARTIN: Well, yes...but a – what did you call it – “glory hole?” “Tea room?”

STEVE: Oh, then you’re not homosexual.

MARTIN: What?

STEVE: If you were a homosexual you’d know what those terms meant.

MARTIN: Well, I...

STEVE: Are you homosexual?

MARTIN: Can you ask me...

STEVE: You signed the waiver.

MARTIN: I know, but still....

STEVE: You’re not a homosexual?

MARTIN: Yes. I mean no.

STEVE: Yes to which question?

MARTIN: The first one.

STEVE: You mean yes to sex in a public place and no to being homosexual?

MARTIN: No... and .... yes.

STEVE: So that’s a no to sex in a public place but yes to being homosexual.

MARTIN: I think so.

STEVE: You think?

MARTIN: Yes...I’ve never had sex in a public place.

STEVE: What about outdoors?

MARTIN: Why do you – I know I signed the waiver – but...

STEVE: We can’t run the risk of someone who engages in risky behavior being in a position that is highly sensitive. There’s all sorts of reasons – you can understand. Blackmail, temptation....

MARTIN: But what about being gay?

STEVE: Oh, that’s fine. We’re very open-minded. We just don’t want to find you being gay in a place that could put you at risk of some activity that would compromise you – or us. Now, the next question: Have you engaged in sexual activity within the last 24 hours.

MARTIN: No

STEVE: Are you sure?

MARTIN: Yes. I live alone. I don’t have a, uh, you-know, so...

STEVE: What about self-abuse?

MARTIN: What?

STEVE: Jacking off.

MARTIN: No.

STEVE: What about lusting in your heart? Did you turn on the TV and admire any men? Did you catch the Hamm twins on the gymnastics finals last night on ESPN?

MARTIN: No, I missed them.

STEVE: What about porn?

MARTIN: No, I don’t watch it.

STEVE: Never?

MARTIN: Once. It was...boring.

STEVE: Boxers or briefs?

MARTIN: Briefs...

STEVE: At the beach. Speedos or surfer jams?

MARTIN: Surfer jams...

STEVE: Cut or uncut?

MARTIN: Cut.

STEVE: Hairy or smooth?

MARTIN: Uh...a little hairy.

STEVE: Muscular or athletic?

MARTIN: Me or...?

STEVE: You. I can’t see under that shirt and tie.

MARTIN: Athletic.

STEVE: Disco or techno?

MARTIN: Classical

STEVE: Ryan or Seth?

MARTIN: What? Who?

STEVE: On “The O.C.” Ryan or Seth?

MARTIN: I don’t watch it much...but they’re high school kids! I don’t ....Look, I really don’t see...

STEVE (interrupting): You signed...

MARTIN (over him): Yes, I know I signed the waiver! I don’t care. I’ll answer your questions! I just want to know why you’re asking me all these very personal questions. I’m not ashamed of who I am. Yes, I’m gay. But what does my choice of underwear have to do with whether or not I get the job?

STEVE: Because I need to know everything about you before you walk through that door. I can’t take a chance that some guy that I know nothing about is going to start seeing and doing things that are highly sensitive to the state of this company and maybe even to the state of this country. I have to know every waking moment what’s going through your head. I have to know what makes you tick. I have to know what makes you hard. I have to know ... right down to the last tingle in your crotch what it will take for you to not talk, not look, not even turn your head when the moment of truth arrives and you’re the last man between our security and the possibility of total compromise and the loss of everything that is holding us together. (A beat.) And I think you’re holding something back.

MARTIN: I’m not, I swear. I’ve told you everything.

STEVE: No. There’s something you’re not telling me.

MARTIN: Ask me again.

STEVE (looking over his shoulder): I can’t. It’s too late.

MARTIN: No! Ask me. I swear I’m not holding anything back. I’ll tell you anything. What do you want to know? Please.

STEVE (getting up from the desk, closing the folder): I think we’re done here.

MARTIN: What was it? What did I do? What didn’t I do?

STEVE: I can’t tell you. It’s too late.

MARTIN (pleading): Oh, God, please! Give me another chance! Tell me! Ask me anything!

STEVE: I think you’d better leave before I call Security.

MARTIN: TELL ME!

STEVE (pulls a cell phone out of his pocket and presses a button): I’ve called Security.

MARTIN (practically begging): I need this job.

STEVE: Quiet, please! If you go quietly, no harm will come to you.

(He indicates the exit. MARTIN finally turns and stumbles off. STEVE watches him go, pulls the top paper out of MARTIN’S folder, folds it neatly, puts it in his pocket, slips the folder into the stack, then sits in one of the chairs. A moment later LEO enters and goes to the desk. He sits down and opens a folder, glances through it, then looks at STEVE.)

LEO: So, you’re here for the data entry position.

STEVE: Yes sir. Ask me anything.

End of play.

Labels:

Saturday, June 11, 2005

Getting to Know You

Those two or three of you who are a regular visitor to this blog may be wondering why I've been, well, ignoring it. First, I didn't promise I would post every day like I do at Bark Bark Woof Woof. Second, I've been devoting a lot of my writing attention to Small Town Boys while Bobby Cramer takes a well-earned break. After all, I did write nearly one hundred new pages in it and spent a lot of time doing substantial revisions to the earlier pages, rounding out Bobby's life before the story really begins and finding a lot of those little annoying things like anachronisms (it's 1979 and that was a long time ago) and tyops typos. Third, I've been putting some of my writing -- mainly Small Town Boys -- on The Practical Press.

TPP has been running for about two months now, and I have found the experience to be amazing. This is the first time in my writing career where I've participated in a cooperative venture like this -- well, at least since high school when our English class put together a mimeographed literary magazine as a senior project. This time the format is much more forgiving, and we have a little wider audience.

The most impressive thing has been the outpouring of writing. We have at least three serialized novels in progress (and I may have missed one or two), a series of short stories, poetry (and not all of it meeting the criterion of "Bad Poetry Friday" -- it's very good), and one or two pieces of playwriting. Apparently we all had a lot of stuff we were working on just waiting for a place to publish.

If the eyes are the mirror of the soul, then the pen is the voice of it. Through these writings I have gained insight to some of the people who make up the core of this group. I know what they love, what they hate, what frightens them, what awes them, and what touches them. They may not have revealed all their secrets -- writers, after all, must keep something for later -- but they have allowed us as readers into their world for the moment, and through that we have also seen what touches us. While we write alone and I have yet to meet any other members of The Practical Press in person, I feel I know them. Writing, in the end, becomes a collaboration between the writer and the reader... we are connected by the words.

I remember the first time I met a famous playwright whose work I had admired for many years. We became friends and as I learned about him and his life and what mattered to him I began to understand his work more deeply than I did when I just read the scripts or saw the performances. I remember thinking that now it all made sense -- why a particular scene, for example, was crafted a certain way. I felt like I was let in on a secret the rest of the audience would never know. But I think that no matter how well I knew him, it didn't change the the meaning of the play or the impact of the characters and their actions. I'm beginning to feel the same way about my fellow writers, and it is a comfort and an inspiration.

Labels: ,

Saturday, January 22, 2005

Writing on Writing - Part 4

Originally published on March 16, 2004:

The Uintah Range in northeast Utah is the only mountain range in the United States that runs east to west. It is a rugged range with high peaks that include King’s Peak, the tallest mountain in the state. It was also where I spent the summer of 1974 as part of an outdoor education course through the National Outdoor Leadership School (NOLS) of Lander, Wyoming. It was my college graduation present.

The course started out in Lander at the NOLS headquarters, an old lumber yard. NOLS was founded in the 1950’s by Paul Petzoldt, a rugged outdoorsman who as a teenager climbed Grand Teton Peak solo in the middle of winter. He started NOLS to teach people how to live in the wilderness and in doing so develop a sense of independence and learn about their own limits and abilities. Perhaps it was the last elements that got to me to go. I had never been an outdoorsy kind of guy, although as a kid I had spent two summers at camp in the Rockies learning to ride horses and hike the trails. NOLS, however, would be different. My group (or “expedition”) was made up of twenty or so men and women from ages sixteen to forty-five. We would be out for six weeks learning all there was to know about hiking, backpacking, and living in the wilderness.

Among the pieces of equipment I carried was 3 x 5 spiral notebook with 70 pages. I had picked it up on impulse at a newsstand in Denver’s Stapleton Airport while I waited for my Frontier flight to Wyoming. I had never kept a diary before, but something made me spend the twenty-nine cents. I started keeping a detailed journal of the trip right then: the first entry was on Sunday, June 9, 1974 at 10:15 a.m. And I was faithful to that little book for the next six weeks, often writing small entries two or three times a day of my moods and impressions, even down to what I had for dinner each night. I kept a separate notebook for the classes we had on flowers, first aid, mountaineering, and so forth, but this little notebook was my refuge. It was small comfort, but when you have nothing to read other than a rather worn copy of Peterson’s Field Guide to Western Birds, it was all there was.

The last four days of the expedition were spent on what they called “survival.” All of the remaining packed-in food has been either eaten or burned; you are left with nothing but your backpack, your cooking equipment (including a fishing pole), and your clothes. The members of the expedition are split up into groups of four or five and given directions on where to go and when to meet up at the trailhead at a specific time four days hence. With that, you’re off.

My little group made good time in our first couple of days and we found ourselves on the shore of a small but fishless lake on the east side of King’s Peak, twenty miles from the trailhead and day ahead of schedule. Two of my group decided to hike over the next pass and look for a lake that had fish, and another member, who had taken a vow of silence for the duration of the survival, went off in another direction to explore and be by himself. That left me alone at the campsite to ward off any wildlife. And so I spent an entire day alone in the middle of a mountain valley.

At first it was pleasant enough – I slept for a while, made a diary entry, watched some hawks and even caught a glimpse of some elk and mountain goats on the far side of the lake. It wasn’t until about noon that the silence and the solitude began to get to me.

I was all alone. For the first time in my life I could not see or hear another human being, and I was in the middle of a valley that was probably five miles long and at least a mile wide. The only sounds were the wind in the trees, the occasional bird call, and the lap of the water on the shore of the lake. And since there were no walls to echo, even if I shouted, my voice would go nowhere. And even though it was a clear and warm day in the middle of July, I couldn’t help a feeling of foreboding, as if there was some kind of danger out there.

Maybe it was the lack of food. Maybe it was the solitude – I hadn’t read a newspaper or heard a radio broadcast in four weeks (and this was the summer that Watergate was reaching its climax; we were all wondering what was going on “out there” – would we come out of the wilderness to find Nixon was no longer president?) Maybe it was the realization that if something was to happen to me that day that no one would know and nothing could be done. A ruptured appendix? A slip on a rock? Evacuation would take days, and all they could do is carry out my body.

King’s Peak loomed over the valley. Our hike in had taken us three-quarters up the side of that mountain before coming down to the shore of the fishless lake. There was no sign of human habitation anywhere. I suddenly felt very alone, very scared, very lost. I wrote an entry in my course notebook: “The wilderness does not care if I live or die out here. It doesn’t notice me. We humans are so arrogant to think we can do anything more than just survive out here without the grace and permission of nature.”

Late that afternoon the rest of my group returned with a nice catch of fish and we ate well that night – it sure beat chewing on mountain bluebell salad as we had done for the first couple of nights.

It would be another two years before the meaning of that solitary day would come clear to me. As in the fashion of all good theatre majors, I discovered that the only way to avoid getting a job in the real world was to go to grad school, and I had done so in the fall of 1975, entering the University of Minnesota to get my masters. But this time I had a goal – getting into teaching – and after a semester of trying acting, the words of my old professor came back, and I switched my field of study to playwriting. One of the degree requirements was to write a play and have it produced. I didn’t know it then, but my little spiral NOLS diary would come in very handy.

Labels: ,

Writing on Writing - Part 5

Originally published on March 23, 2004:

Writing fiction is just taking life and making it interesting.

In the summer of 1976 I got a job as a camp counselor in Colorado. It was part of my plan to get into teaching; what better way to get some experience with kids than spend a summer with them? It was also at a camp where twelve years before I had spent one of the happiest times of my life – four weeks in the mountains learning to ride horses and hike up mountains. My brother and I had ridden out to camp on a train – the Denver Zephyr – from Chicago, and I remember riding the bus up the winding road to the camp and being awestruck by the mountains. One particular peak stood out above the rest. It was still covered with snow in mid-June and I wondered how anyone could ever climb it. Four weeks later I stood on top of it with a group of fellow hikers, shivering in the wind and tossing snowballs on the glacier.

Now I was back there at the mature age of 23, ready to share my NOLS-learned wisdom with these eager young boys for the next eight weeks. I shared a cabin with another counselor named Bill, and while he was a few years younger than me, he had been a camper there for many years (I had only been to camp for two summers; summer school intervened) and he’d also been a counselor the year before, so I learned from him, too. He taught riding, and one Friday morning two weeks into the camp term he went off on a ride with some boys while I and another counselor took a group off on an overnight trip to a nearby campground. I used some of my outdoor cooking skills learned in the Uintahs to make dinner that night, and later we sat around the campfire, told ghost stories, and listened to the owls and the coyotes.

The next morning as we were making breakfast the camp’s assistant director drove out to our campground and told us that Bill had died the night before. He had a congenital heart defect and he had collapsed while playing dodge ball with the other campers after dinner. There was nothing anyone could do – he was dead before he hit the ground.

The campers were young and perhaps this news didn’t really sink in, but it hit me as if Bill was my brother. For the next couple of days I was in shock, and as the activities at camp resumed after a brief interval, I found myself wondering why Bill’s death hurt so much. I hardly knew him for more than a few weeks, and we didn’t really spend that much time together outside of our work at camp. So what was it? Perhaps it was the fact that I had never really known death close up – and that I had seen Bill alive and well one day and come home the next to find him gone. When I got back to the cabin that afternoon, all of his possessions had been packed up and moved out. It was as if he had never been there. Life went on, and no sign of him was left.

A few weeks later I took a day off and drove several hours through the mountains to visit my nephew who was attending another camp in southern Colorado. We spent a nice day together and I left in time to get back before dinner. As I was driving lots of thoughts ran through my mind, one of them being that as a master’s candidate in playwriting at the University of Minnesota, I had to write a play and have it produced in order to complete my degree requirements. I had never written a full-length play before, much less had it produced. I didn’t know any directors or theatres that would produce a new play, and I wasn’t even sure where to begin. But that all was far away in the future that July afternoon; I just had to come up with an idea for a play with a plot, characters, and an interesting story to put them in. Thoughts churned in my head – what kind of conflict could I tell? What kind of characters would be interesting? What was the message? Random thoughts kept popping in and out as I wound my way along the Front Range. I remembered hiking up a mountain with the kids the day before, running and getting under protection as a sudden thunderstorm crashed down on us, trying desperately to remember my rudimentary first-aid training if one of the kids should get hurt – we were so far from the trailhead that even a minor injury was serious. What if disaster had struck? What would we do? Bill came into my mind, followed by a flashback to my lonely day by the fishless lake on the survival in my NOLS class. How the wilderness did not care – we were no more than microbes to the mountains and the forest. What would happen if someone tried to fight back?

People talk about having moments of blinding inspiration, and at that moment I knew what they were talking about. I pulled my car off to the side of the road next to a large boulder, got out, and stared up at the cliffs along the steep red canyon walls. I had my story: lost and frightened boys on a wilderness course in the mountains, not trusting their leaders, easy prey to fear and self-doubt. Only one of them, Elliott, seemed to know all the answers, and he would betray them as well. It was all there. I could see the characters, I knew their names, I knew where they came from, and I knew what made them do what they did. And I even knew the title. I drove back to camp as fast as I could, arriving just as a thunderstorm was building over the mountains behind me, and hurriedly penciled the outline on a single piece of paper.

That night the thunderstorm broke heavily over the mountains and created a horrible flood in a canyon ten miles from where I was sleeping, taking out trees, homes, and killing many people who were suddenly trapped by the rising waters as a huge wall of water tore down the Big Thompson Canyon. It was in the national news the next day and the whole camp turned out to help with the rescue and rebuilding. Nature and the wilderness had proven its power once again.

When camp was over and I drove back to Minnesota, I saw the mountains disappear slowly in my mirror, fading in the late summer haze and finally disappearing as I reached the prairie. But the outline of the play was still with me, and by the first week of October I had written a first draft. Borrowing heavily from my little spiral notebook diary from my NOLS expedition, the loss of Bill, and the force of nature demonstrated in the Big Thompson canyon, I took six teenaged boys and four counselors out into the Colorado mountains and pitted them against themselves, each other, and the wilderness. A fellow grad student in directing read it, liked it, proposed it for production, and the following April The Hunter had its world premiere. I finished my degree and graduated in August. But I didn’t attend the ceremony; I was back out at camp in Colorado, hiking in the mountains.

Labels: ,

Writing on Writing - Part 7

Originally published on April 7, 2004:

The difference between playwriting and most other forms of creative writing is that it isn't a solo effort. For a novel or a short story, all you need is a reader. Sure, you can read the script and understand the plot and the characters, but the script is like a blueprint with all the internal workings - stage directions, costume and prop lists - included. In order for the play to be completed, you need a director, a cast, a stage, sets, lights, costumes, and an audience. And in order for the message to get across, the playwright needs to know the language of the stage.

It's a cumbersome medium. Putting on a play is hard work, and there are all those other people who have to put in their two cents; the director, the designer, the producer, and worst of all, the actors. (I once heard a designer refer to actors as "props with feet.") And they're all there with their egos and "concepts" to interpret the story the playwright has crafted. The results are sometimes surprising.

When The Hunter was written, it was my first foray into letting a work of mine go off on its own. The director was a man with very strong ideas of his own - including not allowing me to attend many of the rehearsals. I was stunned, and it led to a tense relationship between us for a while; both of us had to learn about the playwright/director relationship. (Rule Number 1: both playwright and director need to learn how to trust each other.) But when the play was finally ready for staging, I was both surprised and amazed that what I had written six months before was suddenly on the stage. Those actors were speaking my lines. The audience was listening to my words. And when it was all over, everybody clapped. I went to the director and cast afterwards and paid them the highest compliment I could think of: "It's what I meant to say."

The reviews were pretty good. Not great, but what could I expect for my first effort? One thing I found intriguing was reading reviews written by Intro To Drama students who had no idea that the playwright was a fellow student at the University of Minnesota. I learned a lot about my characters and what the play said to them - things I had no idea were in the play. I was invited to speak to a class about my play and one student asked me a very complex question about the psychological background of the main character. For a moment I tried to come up with something that sounded intelligent, but in the end I just said, "Well, I really don't know - I just wrote the play, that's all."

One of the questions most often asked of playwrights is "Why do you write plays?" (The smartass answer is that there's no heavy lifting required.) It's usually asked in terms of other forms of writing - why plays instead of novels or poetry? I can't speak for other playwrights, but it has to do with the characters. When I become acquainted with a character that I want to write about, I see them in their world and I know how I want to tell their story. Sometimes it's a play, sometimes it's not, and sometimes, like The Hunter, I can make them work in both. The format of playwriting isn't that hard, but it does require thinking in terms of the stage. What you can tell in five pages in a novel has to be distilled to an action, a line, or a monologue in a play. The audience fills in the rest, and you have to trust them - and yourself - to make it work. And sometimes you see the characters in a way that only a novel is the way to tell the story. That's the case with my current piece in progress.

The second most often-asked question of playwrights - or any author - is "Where do you get your ideas?" The answer is simple: from me. It sounds trite, but writers do write about what they know best, and that's themselves. They find something in their lives that they feel they must express and out it comes. The plays that I have written have all been about characters that are me or like me and what is important to them. And I'm not alone. Contemporary playwrights such as Tennessee Williams, Arthur Miller, William Inge, Neil Simon, Wendy Wasserstein, August Wilson, Sam Shepard, and Lanford Wilson, just to name a few, have turned the stage into the psyschiatrist's couch where all the slights and turmoils of their lives are analyzed and dissected for all to see. (Not that I would compare my work for an instant to any of those writers - they are lightyears beyond my feeble efforts.) It's not unique to playwriting. Contemporary fiction and film has become character-driven, sometimes taking a plot along just to keep the action moving. I've written, at last count, four full-length plays since The Hunter, and I revised it heavily when I directed a production of it in 1984. (Don't ask - a playwright shouldn't direct his own stuff.) All of the works since then have been about characters who are trying to find themselves a place in the world and what they're supposed to do in it. That sounds like me.

Oh, one question I get asked a lot is "Why is it spelled 'playwright'?" To wright means to craft, as in "to build." Playwrights, like sculptors or blacksmiths, form something out of words and assemble them for presentation. It's merely a trick of the language that "playwright" and "playwriting" sound alike. But it's a happy coincidence.

Labels: ,